The disk saucer has the AC thrusters in series. The cone ufo in
parallel. Burning propellant directly as rocket exit as the NASA
Atlas 5 is 98 percent fuel waste. The same as rocket turbine to
drive a superconducting AC generator is about 80 percent applied
to my ac ufo motor gets up to 8 g acceleration straight up past
atmosphere with still enough static Thrust to orbital on stored
gas reserves. Why? Because this model shows the ac motor works
parallel too as a belt around the cone lower portion.
Electric field is volts per meter length. 10 thousand positive volts at the tip of a needle robs an out at electron. Ten negative positive volts adds to the same gas molecules an extra electron. These waves of negative molecules followed by positive charged molecules are forcibly attracted to the rebalser half capacitor that is 180 degrees out of phase. When the emitter is positive the rebalser is negative in AC very fast. The surface charge electrons bounce up and down from the rebalser external surface effecting the inverse making the passing ionic gas neutral again without slowing it down. The needle points should be hollow and imbedded in corning glass with tiny hole exits for the ions to rush over the wc toward the rebalser.
I tested the functionality of just one tiny hole and felt a breeze a yard away at atmospheric pressure sea level. That I am using aluminum screen wire as a substitute is because I am merely demonstrating the motor works because I don’t have money to work with unbreakable glass and precision. Unfortunately the device made with scotch tape looks similar to the old 1957 popular electronic device. Engineers walk away because they are stupid and think they know it all not realizing they are looking at something very different.
By the way the speed of an electron around a proton forming a hydrogen atom is two third of the earth’s diameter per sec laid out flat. That’s why I see a glow at night when I power up the ufo lab motor from the aluminum grid needle points. To give you some idea how powerfully the charged gas is accelerating toward the rebalser.
Tension from 10 thousand volts to a million across the same one centimeter wc strip separating the emitter to rebalser. The static thrust would raise enormously but the insulation on the rebalser would have to be adjusted but not by much because glass as thin as the plastic I’m useing could take 80 thousand volts where I’m using 10 thousand. In contrast with DC the inverse because with DC both the emitter and collector has to be nude metal. No insulation.
That means reducing tension with altitude to about 300 volts some 60 miles up and with that static thrust. To increase distance between emitter and rebalser works even better eliminating putting a number one behind the other for the AC motor which won’t break down into arc discharge even if rained on because of its insulated rebalser. The AC motor for its weight can be thousands of times more powerful than it’s DC motor counterpart for the same weight. It merely takes engineers picking up where I left off. Without funding I’m limited to scotch tape and scissors.